Sure, absolutely.
But just because one guy can sit in a chair for 24 or 48 hours, doesn't
mean he is a better op than the other guy who consistently wins a CW
sprint.
Not that I think it should be worth more points than an ARRL or
something... but endurance has nothing to do with being a good op.
-Chris KL9A
On Sat, 2005-12-17 at 22:26 -0800, Ken Widelitz wrote:
> Hi Chris,
>
> I think most people would agree that it requires MUCH less endurance to sit
> in the chair for four hours than it does for even only twenty-four hours.
>
> 73, Ken, K6LA / VY2TT
>
>
>
--
Chris Hurlbut <c_hurlbut@adelphia.net>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|