To: | cq-contest@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] WRTC - An Objective Selection Criterion? |
From: | Cqtestk4xs@aol.com |
Date: | Mon, 19 Dec 2005 22:12:02 EST |
List-post: | <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
In a message dated 12/20/05 2:25:27 AM Greenwich Standard Time, w2id@optonline.net writes: wouldn't Morse Runner be as good a measure as any? A couple of problems with Morserunner....... The WRTC is a CW AND SSB contest. There is no S/P on Morserunner. There are no decisions to be made by the ops as to which beam heading to use or what band to use. The Morserunner is good practice for CW, not a definer of a good overall contester. Bill K4XS _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Why 160m in SS?, Cqtestk4xs |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Casual Contesting, Bill Turner |
Previous by Thread: | [CQ-Contest] Duping non-participant packet cheaters not-in-log, Art Boyars |
Next by Thread: | [CQ-Contest] RES: WRTC issues..., PY5EG |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |