CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Why 160m in SS?

To: Doug Smith W9WI <w9wi@earthlink.net>,cq-contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Why 160m in SS?
From: Ed K1EP <k1ep.list@gmail.com>
Reply-to: k1ep.list@gmail.com
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 19:33:50 -0500
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
At 12/20/2005 09:05 AM, Doug Smith W9WI wrote:
>> At 12/19/2005 07:47 PM, Dale Martin wrote:
>> 
>> >Why is there a 160m band category (?) in SS CW/SSB? 
>
>To go in the other direction...  what about VHF?  
>
>I'm probably missing something, but I don't see anything in the SS rules
>that prevents the use of amateur frequencies above 30MHz.  I definitely
>recall seeing in an old SS writeup (admittedly from the 1950s!) where
>someone took advantage of an Es opening to work a number of QSOs on 6
>meters...

. Object: For stations in the United States and Canada (including territories 
and possessions) to exchange QSO information with as many other US and Canadian 
stations as possible on 160, 80, 40, 20, 15 and 10 meter bands. 


>-- 
>Doug Smith W9WI
>Pleasant View (Nashville), TN  EM66
>http://www.w9wi.com
>
>_______________________________________________
>CQ-Contest mailing list
>CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>