To: | cq-contest@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | [CQ-Contest] QSL Policy |
From: | K1AR@aol.com |
Date: | Thu, 5 Jan 2006 22:45:15 EST |
List-post: | <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
In a message dated 1/5/2006 6:32:48 PM Eastern Standard Time, teemu@sm0wka.com writes: Yes LOTW is a relief for some hams, then it also Kills the pleasure of others. Still not answering paper QSLs is non-hamspirit For what it's worth, I answer all the cards I receive -- bureau or otherwise. I've never kept score on the return postage thing. In keeping with the most recent thread, life is too short for QRP (code for, "life is too short to worry about missing a 37 cent stamp). With or without an SASE, I'll still be going to work tomorrow. 73 John, K1AR _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] R: QRP - Get Over It, Tom Osborne |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] The irony of Operating Time [was: Logging Time [was:Contesting Time Calculation]], Radiosporting Fan |
Previous by Thread: | [ct-user] New Super Check Partial Files Available VER20060106 (6 Jan2006), Randy Thompson, K5ZD |
Next by Thread: | [CQ-Contest] ARRL RTTY Roundup Practice - Friday,January 6 (Pacific local), Marc Ziegler, W6ZZZ |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |