[Top] [All Lists]

[CQ-Contest] SSB was better

To: "Contest Reflector" <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: [CQ-Contest] SSB was better
From: "PY2NY - Vitor" <py2ny@arrl.net>
Reply-to: PY2NY - Vitor <py2ny@arrl.net>
Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2006 00:02:55 -0300
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Hi everybody
Thanks to everyone that answer my message about
my "ear limits". I had chance to talk with other
guys from Brasil and the conclusion is that
was really a propagation problem to us and
not exactly a "health trouble" hi hi hi...
W/VE heard us better and better, but not
the same at this side...
Anyway, 1.300 Qs and 59 multipliers was
good. Said KW but was 700w all the time...
See you at WPX - best 73 from PY2NY
CQ-Contest mailing list

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • [CQ-Contest] SSB was better, PY2NY - Vitor <=