You are correct, and the contest sponsors who are interested either have
their own source for the same data or have been regularly asking me for the
raw data. And if you dig deep enough and compare between the 3830 claimed
scores and what finally shows up in the final results there are some missing
scores and some in different categories. I only wish that the sponsors
would publish the specifics of all the cases, though I guess that some of
them were logs that just didn't get submitted or were voluntarily withdrawn.
David Robbins K1TTT
e-mail: mailto:k1ttt@arrl.net
web: http://www.k1ttt.net
AR-Cluster node: 145.69MHz or telnet://dxc.k1ttt.net
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:cq-contest-
> bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Eric Hilding
> Sent: Saturday, March 11, 2006 11:15
> To: cq-contest@contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] CONTEST CRIMINALS
>
> If I understand some of K1TTT's [arrl dx ssb spotting report] analysis
> data correctly, are there really stations committing ILLEGAL FORGERIES by
> using other operator's callsigns in their "self-posting" activities?
>
> My God, if this indeed is true, PLEASE send a copy of your data to the
> Contest Sponsor along with a request to have the logs of those "Contest
> Criminals" thrown out and their callsigns published in a "Contest
> Criminals" list in the results.
>
> In the event I have misunderstood the data, please excuse this post.
>
> 73...
>
> Rick, K6VVA
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|