[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] 2006 WPX SSB - USA Band Summary 28Mar2006

To: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>, W5PR@swbell.net,k5zm@comcast.net, CQ-Contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] 2006 WPX SSB - USA Band Summary 28Mar2006
From: Alan Zack <k7acz@cox.net>
Reply-to: k7acz@cox.net
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2006 19:40:28 -0800
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Sorry, I was looking at too many 3830 reports.  Comments were directed 
to the ARRL CW Contest.

W0MU Mike Fatchett wrote:

>Huh?  The log deadline has not passed.
>Are you talking about Sweeptstakes?  There are no sections in WPX 
>-----Original Message-----
>From: cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com
>[mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Alan Zack
>Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2006 2:38 PM
>To: mwdink@eskimo.com
>Cc: CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] 2006 WPX SSB - USA Band Summary 28Mar2006
>OK, the deadline for log submissions is past.  Why not NOW show the sections
>for the stations listed so we can compare our score with others in our
>section?  Last time I asked the reply was something to do with the possibly
>of cheating but I don't really understand how a station could cheat somehow
>by seeing a listing of sections worked by other stations.  As it is, there
>is no way to compare your score against others unless you are a big gun and
>have a chance for a National award instead of just being a leader in your
>mwdink@eskimo.com wrote:

Alan Zack
Amateur Radio Station K7ACZ
Official USCG Auxiliary Comm Station
Las Vegas, Nevada, USA

CQ-Contest mailing list

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>