[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Fw: 7QP Rules

To: Randy Thompson <k5zd@charter.net>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Fw: 7QP Rules
From: Alan Zack <k7acz@cox.net>
Reply-to: k7acz@cox.net
Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 11:04:14 -0700
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
It may very well be a log checkers nightmare.  I was called by, and also 
answered callers in the IN and NE QSO parties as well as the ARI 
Contest, some random stations asking for a NV QSL (I doubt if they will 
submit a log) and a couple of special event stations.  Too bad the bands 
were too good for us.  10 and 15 were really dead for me.

Randy Thompson wrote:

>Congratulations to the 7QP organizers! From here in W1, it appeared that the
>activity from all across the 7th call area was fantastic.  Probably the best
>debut of a new QSO party I can think of!
>The downside (for me) was that the 7-land guys were so active that they kind
>of took over the band from the New England QSO Party!  :)  But, it was nice
>to call CQ and have so many answers from WY, MT, and ID!
>Congratulations again.  I think the first weekend of May is now overloaded
>with contests (7QP, INQP, NEQP, CH, and ARI).
>Randy, K5ZD
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com 
>>[mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of N7MAL
>>Sent: Sunday, May 07, 2006 10:30 PM
>>To: Rex Maner; CQ-CONTEST
>>Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Fw: 7QP Rules
>>Well Quack the contest is over, did you get more than 3 or 4 
>>Q's? (I ask tongue in cheek) From the Northwest corner of 
>>Arizona, AZMHV, the contest was a success. It can only get 
>>bigger-n-better in the years to come. Having multiple QSO 
>>parties on the same weekend worked out very well for 
>>everyone, except the log checkers. I suspect there are going 
>>to many Uniques.
>>Don't worry about the world coming to an end today.
>>It's already tomorrow in Australia
>>  ----- Original Message -----
>>  From: Rex Maner
>>  Sent: Saturday, May 06, 2006 1:53
>>  Subject: [CQ-Contest] Fw: 7QP Rules
>>  BOY  oh  BOY     I only got 3 responses to that posting,  I 
>>hope at 05:00 
>>  local tomorrow there are more than  3 or 4 of us !!!   Its 
>>sure gonna be 
>>  lonely.
>>  Quack
>>  ----- Original Message -----
>>  From: "Alan Zack" <k7acz@cox.net>
>>  To: "Rex Maner" <k7qq@netzero.net>
>>  Cc: "CQ Contest" <cq-contest@contesting.com>
>>  Sent: Friday, May 05, 2006 6:08 PM
>>  Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] 7QP Rules
>>  > No S/N that I know of. See:
>>  > http://www.7qp.org/
>>  >
>>  > On rules page rules say:
>>  > Exchange: 7th area stations send signal report plus 
>>5-letter state/county 
>>  > code (e.g. ORDES; see list).    County-line stations send 
>>multiple codes 
>>  > (state code needed only once, e.g. ORDES/JEF).    All 
>>others send signal 
>>  > report plus state/province/DX (stations in other QSO 
>>parties send their 
>>  > appropriate exchange).    "Provinces" are VE1-9, VO and VY0-2.
>>  >
>>  > My exchange will be NVCLA (Clark county NV)
>>  >
>>  > Rex Maner wrote:
>>  >
>>  >>I just read the rules in QST for  the 7QP and the 
>>exchange information 
>>  >>says  Serial Nr.  + The rules at   the sponsor says  RST +
>>  >>
>>  >>I'm planning   RS/RST +   ??
>>  >>
>>  >>Quack
>>  >>
>>  >>_______________________________________________
>>  >>CQ-Contest mailing list
>>  >>CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>>  >>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>>  >>

Alan Zack
Amateur Radio Station K7ACZ
Official USCG Auxiliary Comm Station
Las Vegas, Nevada, USA
Quality Engineer, The Boeing Company, Retired
Aviation Chief Warrant Officer, U.S. Coast Guard, Retired
U.S. Coast Guard, Always Ready, Always There
Every hour, Every day, Around the Clock and Around the World

CQ-Contest mailing list

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>