[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Amateur predators

To: <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Amateur predators
From: "Mark Beckwith" <n5ot@n5ot.com>
Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 17:30:24 -0500
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Thanks Rusty :) Let me clarify that between the ages of 13 and 18 I was hit 
on by two presumably gay or pedophilic (or both) adult men who were licensed 
radio amateurs.  Neither of them accomplished any illegal activity with me 
and I assume they move freely today.

How's that for talking the long way around :)

It was not a Big Deal.

Mark, N5OT

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Russell Hill" <rustyhill@earthlink.net>
To: "Mark Beckwith" <n5ot@n5ot.com>; <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2006 3:03 PM
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Amateur predators

> Mark, I do not know the circumstances, so I cannot comment.
> In my high school ham radio club, there were a couple of hams who were 
> regularly dating a girl in the club, and later told me they considered her 
> the best kept secret in high school.
> The three of them were also members of the chess club, if I remember 
> correctly.
> So were they 2 hams hitting on another ham, or 2 chess club members 
> hitting on another chess player?  Or just 2 guys in high school behaving 
> as their sexual proclivities led them to behave?
> I think the comments about the relative safety of the ham radio community 
> vs the Internet, chat rooms, etc, is probably right on the mark.
> 73, and I have enjoyed your commentary on the reflecter on many occasions. 
> Many thanks for them all.
> Rusty, na5tr 

CQ-Contest mailing list

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>