CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Is it a time to change rules for HQ stns in

To: <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Is it a time to change rules for HQ stns in
From: "Marijan Miletic" <s56a@bit.si>
Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 00:22:03 +0200
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
DF3KV wrote:
The low bands are a bit different there they are more valuable.
Don´t overrate the value of calls with the own country for the final result.
 
These are this year 3830 data for 160 m EU and NA HQ.  No overrating, please
:-)
 
T90HQ  160:   213     24    33 

OE1A   160:   400    503    38 

OM6HQ  160:   424    358    39

4N9HQ  160:   428    265    39 
OL4HQ  160:   440    277    40
OP0HQ  160:   470    196    46
DA0HQ  160:  1199   1205    42 
 
VA3RAC 160:   154     0      9
NU1AW  160:   256    155    19 
W1AW   160:   266    112    14
 
73 de Mario, S56A, N1YU
 
 
 

 

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>