[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL says no to opening logs...

To: CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL says no to opening logs...
From: Hank Garretson <w6sx@arrl.net>
Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 14:11:58 -0700
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
At 11:05 AM Monday 14 08 06, Zack Widup wrote:

>An example of this was a DXpedition I worked several years ago.  I had
>about 7 QSO's in their log but my 40m CW QSO was missing.  I suspected
>they busted it and guessed at the busted call.  That call showed up in
>their log search engine with only one QSO - on 40 CW.
>I sent another card to the manager for the missing QSO and explaining I
>thought the call was busted as W9##. He said all my QSO info was correct
>but just wanted to double-check with the station whose call was in the
>log.  That person informed the manager he wasn't even a DX'er, so I got
>the card for the missing QSO.

I think "busted QSO" is an oxymoron.  I suggest that if correct call
signs weren't exchanged and logged in real time, then it wasn't a
valid QSO and after-the-fact notes don't make it valid.


Hank, W6SX

Mammoth Lakes, California 

CQ-Contest mailing list

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>