| To: | <cq-contest@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] ft1kd vs ft1kmp |
| From: | "Art Boyars" <art.boyars@verizon.net> |
| Date: | Sun, 20 Aug 2006 10:36:26 -0400 |
| List-post: | <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
I follow the Reflector on the Web, so VE4XT's posting came right after the long (and interesting) discussion of the PT5M vs PW5C scores. Hence, my first thought about Kelly's subject was: "Well, 'kd has an obvious advantage, with fewer bauds in his call. But where the heck is ft1??" Sorry. 73, Art K3KU _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Why did the Canadians (PT5M) beat theAmericans(PW5C)in WRTC 2006?, Barry Merrill |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Why did the Canadians (PT5M) beat the Americans(PW5C)in WRTC 2006?, Ted Bryant |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] ft1kd vs ft1kmp, Michael Tope |
| Next by Thread: | [CQ-Contest] Travel with radios -- follow-up, Ethan Miller K8GU |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |