CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] 1966 vs 2006 [was: Why did the Canadians (PT5M)beat the

To: CQ-Contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] 1966 vs 2006 [was: Why did the Canadians (PT5M)beat the Ame...
From: PaulKB8N@aol.com
Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 17:18:33 EDT
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
 
In a message dated 8/21/2006 4:13:20 P.M. Central Standard Time,  
n4zr@contesting.com writes:

Given  the state-of-the-art in 2006 (and
>the ability of modern transceivers to  dig out weaker
>signals), I would wonder if the number is closer  to
>5-dB or more before "another layer" is revealed due
>simply to  technical issues and not operator skill


My impression of modern transceivers is not altogether good.  My stock  Drake 
R-4B never had any trace of intermod or overload problems that many  "modern" 
transceivers have, and it was plenty sensitive, too.
 
Paul, K5AF
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Re: [CQ-Contest] 1966 vs 2006 [was: Why did the Canadians (PT5M)beat the Ame..., PaulKB8N <=