CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] 1966 vs 2006 [was: Why did the Canadians (PT5M)beat the

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] 1966 vs 2006 [was: Why did the Canadians (PT5M)beat the Americans...]
From: Radiosporting Fan <radiosporting@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 16:33:55 -0700 (PDT)
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
--- "Vladimir V. Sidorov" <vs_otw@rogers.com> wrote:
> His 3 ele plus 500 W transmitted were able to break
> another hop losses, so that the crowd of 100 W/wet
> noodle guys could hear HIM, but by return their
> energy could NOT break the 3rd hop power limit
> minimum required. Having had a couple of dB
> by, say, another element in his antenna array or so,
> he might open up another layer of stations, ...

Interestingly, Vladimir ... I've observed the same
thing at the other end of the spectrum... 24 and 47
GHz.

SSB Electronics makes a 0.2 mW (yes, 200 microwatts!)
47 GHz transverter.  Even into a 1-foot dish, the ERP
could not "punch through" much distance (over 20km). 
We played with attempting DX to much frustration.

Eventually, some of our group assembled a power
amplifier that took people "over the threashold" of
background noise and atmospheric losses.  While the
0.2mW stations could *sometimes* (rarely) be heard,
the 10mW stations could *always* be heard by
*everyone*.

In this case, a 15-dB step is what it took to uncover
the "next layer".  FWIW (which is more academic than
scientific),  Ev, W2EV


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>