[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Frequency Conservation

To: "Guy Molinari" <guy_molinari@hotmail.com>, <jimk8mr@aol.com>,<w5ov@w5ov.com>, <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Frequency Conservation
From: "Gerard Lynch" <gerrylynch@freenetname.co.uk>
Reply-to: Gerard Lynch <gerrylynch@freenetname.co.uk>
Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2006 00:49:34 +0100
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Guy Molinari" <guy_molinari@hotmail.com>

>>> I don't see any reason why CW couldn't extend above 3600 in contests 
>>> like SS.   This happens all the time on 40M from 7050 - 7100.   During 
>>> CQWW CW or ARRL DX CW activity extends well above 7050.   Heck, during 
>>> CQWW CW on 20, activity extends well above 14100.<<<

I finished CQWWCW last year CQing on 7.099 and it worked fine for me.

Wait until the next minimum when the allocations are settled, and we'll see 
plenty of people CQing a little above 7.100 in CQWW CW.


Gerry G0RTN
Vanity Page at http://www.gerrylynch.co.uk
"In days of old, when ops were bold, and sidebands not invented,
The word would pass, by pounding brass, and all were well contented." 

CQ-Contest mailing list

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>