CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] 2006 Pa QSO Party Plans

To: CQ-Contest Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] 2006 Pa QSO Party Plans
From: Doug Smith W9WI <w9wi@earthlink.net>
Date: 13 Oct 2006 19:07:40 -0500
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
On Fri, 2006-10-13 at 15:45, Michael Coslo wrote:
>       Last year, we only required in-state logs to  submit hardcopy  
> summary, and the result was that almost 40 percent of our logs came  
> in without a summary at all. Since we generate the preliminary scores  
> from the summary sheet, that meant that those logs had to be checked  
> before the preliminary results were published, and put us *way*  
> behind schedule.

Do you find claimed scores to be reasonably accurate?

I check the logs for the Tennessee QSO Party, and find that claimed
scores are often wrong, often by large amounts.  
-- 
Doug Smith W9WI
Pleasant View (Nashville), TN  EM66
http://www.w9wi.com

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>