On Fri, 2006-10-13 at 15:45, Michael Coslo wrote:
> Last year, we only required in-state logs to submit hardcopy
> summary, and the result was that almost 40 percent of our logs came
> in without a summary at all. Since we generate the preliminary scores
> from the summary sheet, that meant that those logs had to be checked
> before the preliminary results were published, and put us *way*
> behind schedule.
Do you find claimed scores to be reasonably accurate?
I check the logs for the Tennessee QSO Party, and find that claimed
scores are often wrong, often by large amounts.
Doug Smith W9WI
Pleasant View (Nashville), TN EM66
CQ-Contest mailing list