CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

[CQ-Contest] FW: CT vs. N1MM

To: <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: [CQ-Contest] FW: CT vs. N1MM
From: "Warren Rothberg" <w4wr@bellsouth.net>
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 08:55:32 -0400
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Thank you for the eight responses I received. Seven endorsed N1MM over CT.
Since I now use the DXLab suite for general logging, I am used to the
multiple windows. I’ve been playing with the program for hours and having a
blast. Thanks again, all.

 

Warren

 

 

From: Warren Rothberg [mailto:w4wr@bellsouth.net] 
Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2006 12:31
To: 'cq-contest@contesting.com'
Subject: CT vs. N1MM

 

I have used CT for contesting since I bought my first copy in Dayton in
1987. I have not kept up with developments in the N1MM contest software at
all. So now, 19 years later, I am wondering what the pro’s/con’s of each
package are. Has anyone published a comparison? Is it time to change?

 

Thanks for your input.  By the way, my setup is XP SP2 with dual monitors.

 

Warren, W4WR

 

 


--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.408 / Virus Database: 268.13.4/480 - Release Date: 17-Oct-06



-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.408 / Virus Database: 268.13.7/488 - Release Date: 19-Oct-06
 
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • [CQ-Contest] FW: CT vs. N1MM, Warren Rothberg <=