You have some "stinkin thinkin" going on here especially the part about not
logging the zero pointers.
It is the CQ WW "DX" contest. Giving points for US contacts that are not
multipliers would not be a good thing. Giving points to US stations for
in country contacts will make it just another "domestic contest"
Its pretty common for us at W3PP to work one of these enthusiastic stateside
newbies in the CQWW or ARRL DX tests to say, thanks, this is the second year
in a row that I got you on 160 thru 15 I'll see you on 10
we also get them wanting to work us on all bands in SS.
Don't hold your breath waiting for cq to change the rules.
Rick, CHAMPIONS ADJUST ! Put em in the log and move on. Not logging zero
pointers is definitely the WRONG thing to do.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Rick Dougherty" <email@example.com>
To: "CQ Contest" <firstname.lastname@example.org>; "Steve.Root@culligan.com"
Sent: October 30, 2006 2:42 PM
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] zero pointers
> It is far easier to work from PA0 to DL1 and receive 2 points than it is
> a W0 to work a W6 on 80m...whats the logic in the former and not at least
> give the latter 1 point???
> de Rick nq4i
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Steve.Root@culligan.com" <email@example.com>
> To: "CQ Contest" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> Sent: Monday, October 30, 2006 2:10 PM
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] zero pointers
>> > It is supposed to be a DX contest...
>> > Mike, W1NR
>> Define DX? It's probably harder for you to work California on 75 meters
>> that it is to work Europe.
>> 73 Steve K0SR
>> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest mailing list