CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

[CQ-Contest] Packet vs. Telnet (be serious)

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: [CQ-Contest] Packet vs. Telnet (be serious)
From: sawyered@earthlink.net
Reply-to: sawyered@earthlink.net
Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2006 13:18:53 -0500 (GMT-05:00)
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Am I the only one who is shaking their head at the concept that people are 
starting to backslide themselves into thinking that accessing the worldwide 
internet spot database through RF packet could somehow be considered "amateur 
radio means".  Do we also consider IRLP to be "real DXing" because one guy is 
on an HT?

Come on guys....lets make it simple....if you aren't doing whatever you are 
doing on the assigned HF bands of the contest "you aren't meeting the intent of 
the contest for being unassisted".  Anything beyond that is silly, really.

Ed  N1UR  "contesting is more fun and simpler...unassisted"
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • [CQ-Contest] Packet vs. Telnet (be serious), sawyered <=