CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Sweepstakes: Should I be penalized forgetting mylicense

To: "'CQ Contest Reflector'" <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Sweepstakes: Should I be penalized forgetting mylicense in 2000?
From: "Ron Notarius W3WN" <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
Date: Thu, 09 Nov 2006 21:50:59 -0500
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Although numerically 00 - 06 are smaller numbers than 12, they represent the
years 2000 - 2006; 12 represents 1912 (at least for another 6 years when we
finally overlap the centuries).  So 12 is still the earliest check possible,
even if it's not the lowest number possible.

73

-----Original Message-----
From: Brad Hedges [mailto:bhedges@nc.rr.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2006 7:05 PM
To: 'Ron Notarius W3WN'; 'CQ Contest Reflector'
Subject: RE: [CQ-Contest] Sweepstakes: Should I be penalized forgetting
my license in 2000?


Well, 00-06 are, really, earlier than 12... just a century later!
73,
Brad
AL4T/4
Ck 03


<snip>
And the earliest possible check would be "12" since 1912 was the first year
that the US Department of Commerce started issuing licenses to operate in
what we now know of as the Amateur service.  Outside of a handful of club
stations, some of whom either aren't active in SS or who don't know what
their check should be, I don't think you'll find too many of those around
(or any other check earlier than 20).  Of course, that will change in 6
years... but before we have a century overlap, it would be curious to see
how many ancient checks, so to speak, turn up.

73, ron w3wn


Sergeant First Class, Infantry
82d Airborne Division

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>