CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Casual vs organized "alerting"

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Casual vs organized "alerting"
From: Ev Tupis <w2ev@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2006 04:00:05 -0800 (PST)
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
----- Original Message ----
From: Robert Naumann <w5ov@w5ov.com>

While I understand the intent here to do things totally on your own, the 
reality is that if I was calling CQ in SS, and someone randomly drops by and 
says "hey Oven, VY1JA is up 10 if you need him", I would not hesitate to go up 
10 and work Jay. How could I ignore that information? Why should I? Is there a 
limit to how long I should ignore it? 10 minutes, an hour... what if Jay QSYs 
up 2? Would it be OK then? What if he never QSYs for the rest of
the contest? Is he off-limits to me because someone I did not ask to help me 
told me about Jay's whereabouts? No way.
---------------------------

Great points, Bob.  Let's assume for a moment that a (or "some future") sponsor 
actually defines the term, "assistance" which includes the intent of "do things 
totally on your own" (with "do" being the operative...acting on information, 
not simply having the information given).

What are the thoughts of list members as to addressing Bob's items above?  What 
are your thoughts as to a time-delay limit placed on acting on unsolicited 
assistance?  I don't have an opinion...I'm trying to form one. :)

Ev, W2EV


 
____________________________________________________________________________________
Want to start your own business?
Learn how on Yahoo! Small Business.
http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/r-index
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>