CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Tracing the Evolution of the Single Op and readingthe t

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Tracing the Evolution of the Single Op and readingthe tea leaves.
From: K6VVA <dx35@hilding.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 12:54:41 -0800
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Paul, EI5DI, wrote:

 > > ASSISTANCE VIA PACKET/INTERNET/SPOTTING NETS/ETC: WHAT IT CHANGES
 >
 > There is only one change.  As G4BUO says, and how
 > often must it be repeated? - "the critical point that
 > separates it (spotting assistance) from all the other
 > 'technology' is that the help is coming from other
 > individuals in real time, during the contest."
 >
 > That's why SO and SO-Assisted should remain, or become,
 > separate categories.

Hmmm..."the critical point that separates it (spotting assistance) from 
all  the other technology is that the help is coming from other individuals 
in real time, during the contest."

OK.  Once again, EVERY "Spot-EE" is really receiving "Assistance" from all 
the "Spot-ORs" posting "real time" directions on where to find the 
"Spot-EE".  This is a bona fide valuable "Assistance" that can increase QSO 
and Multiplier rates of the "Spot-EE".   By definition, that places the 
"Spot-EEs" by proxy into an "Assisted" category any way you cut the mustard.

So, what are the Contest Sponsors going to do about this "Reality" now that 
the cat is finally out of the bag???????

Inquiring minds would like to know. Preferably, *before* the next contest.

Tnx & 73...

Rick, K6VVA



_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>