CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] improving pileup efficiency (was NOT ID'ing every

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] improving pileup efficiency (was NOT ID'ing every
From: Jimk8mr@aol.com
Date: Mon, 25 Dec 2006 23:57:06 EST
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Another factor in deciding how often to ID is how smooth was the  last qso.
 
If it was just a quick report at 40 wpm (or the phone equivalent),   one can 
stretch things a bit.
 
If the other guy has corrected his callsign, twice, at 18 wpm, the running  
station ought to ID PDQ.
 
 
73  -  Jim   K8MR
 
 
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>