Paul O'Kane wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Ev Tupis" <w2ev@yahoo.com>
> .
> .
>
>> If your ARRL 10 Meter contest log shows a QSO with W2EV and
>> a received RST of "59", it is a bust.
>>
>
> It's not a bust. The reality is that, in ARRL (and CQ) HF
> contests, all that matters is that your Cabrillo QSO records
> show valid reports, regardless of the actual reports (if any)
> that were sent or received.
>
> Reports are ignored for cross-checking purposes.
>
> A rule without a penalty is not a rule. It's a request or a
> recommendation - take your pick.
>
> 73 & HNY,
> Paul EI5DI
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
>
I find it very amusing that people make statements about how logs are
(or are not) checked without any information to support their
assertions. I am part of the logchecking team for the ARRL 10M contest
and know for a fact that in regards to that contest (and the ARRL 160 as
well) that he is wrong. I'm curious as to what he bases his statements
on, because I know he's never contacted the logchecking team to get the
actual answer.
Dave/K8CC
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|