Rick wrote the email that I was going to write. The idea that 48 hours
makes any sense for a single operator is foolish. Frankly, some guys are
going to die from blood clots, etc. The 36 hour max for S/Os is a terrific
rule. It turns the contest into a strategic thing, not a blind stupid
unhealthy endurance contest. I realize that there will be traditionalists
who will make their usual arguments that stamina is part of the contest,
and that a maximum time limit will somehow reduce participation. I disagree
on all fronts. It will increase participation. It certainly will for me, as
I will no longer operate any contest over 24 hours that lacks a maximum
limit for single operators.
If you are concerned that records will no longer be meaningful, who now
cares that the ARRL DX contest used to be *two* weekends on both modes.
It's time for the League to do the right thing; place a reasonable maximum
time limit on this contest for single operators.
Jim George N3BB
At 12:45 PM 2/19/2007 -0800, Eric Hilding wrote:
><annual suggestion>
>
>After reading many "I couldn't operate more than 30, 35 or 40 hours" type
>comments in 3830 posts, it's that time again for my Annual Suggestion to
>add a "36 out of 48 Hours" category (or something like that) to the ARRL
>DX Contest for those of us in the Geriatric Generation.
>
>I appreciated the past supportive comments of AL, D4B/4L5A, and others who
>also believe that such a Category might actually increase activity. OF's
>who aren't willing to make a serious effort or sacrifice their health
>knowing they can't (or won't) be able to do the entire 48 hours are more
>likely to go like proverbial bats-out-of-h*ll for 36 hours in the chance
>to competitively win something.
>
></annual suggestion>
>
>73...
>
>Rick, K6VVA
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|