Tonno,
how cann you be sure that OE4A was Multi Op?
you cann call it as you wish!
every one who want´s to check OE4A credibility is most willkommen.
even we will be happy to have finaly one (how didi you call it ?!) "top
notch operator"
as guest for SOAB effort......
73 es best dx
de OE1EMS
Braco
p.s.
in ARRL SSB OE4A will be M/2
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tonno Vahk" <tonno.vahk@mail.ee>
To: <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2007 10:24 AM
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Life in the World of Packet
> Accusations are most probably unfounded as OE4A must have been Multi Op I
> am
> sure. After years of blatant cheating SO results from him would have zero
> credibility anyway so does not make much sense to participate in this
> class.
>
> The question of whether getting help from cluster to copy the call is
> ethical is left open of course but in reality it is also very difficult
> mentally not to use this info once you see it already...
>
> 73
> Tonno
> ES5TV
>
> p.s. the only ES5 active in ARRL DX was ES5RR from my station, no ES5E
> call
> assigned yet:)))
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <k4zw@comcast.net>
> To: <cq-contest@contesting.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2007 3:01 AM
> Subject: [CQ-Contest] Life in the World of Packet
>
>
>> Results of the 2005 CQ WW DX SSB Contest
>> Disqualified: 9A4X - illegal operation in T9;
>> OE4A (OE1EMS) - illegal use of packet
>> spotting in the single operator category
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> "I guess your "Hmmmmm" might very well be justified."
>>
>> you sure about that jim?!
>>
>> 73 de OE1EMS (OE4A in ARRL 2007 CW)
>> Braco
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Jan Erik Holm" <sm2ekm at telia.com>
>> Cc: <cq-contest at contesting.com>
>> Sent: Monday, February 19, 2007 9:58 PM
>> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Life in the World of Packet
>>
>>
>>> As far as I remember OE4A got hit with packet cheating in
>>> the CQWW a couple years ago.
>>> I guess your "Hmmmmm" might very well be justified.
>>>
>>> 73 Jim SM2EKM
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>> _______________________________________________
>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|