CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

[CQ-Contest] Packet is the root of all evil but...

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: [CQ-Contest] Packet is the root of all evil but...
From: sawyered@earthlink.net
Reply-to: sawyered@earthlink.net
Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2007 13:17:26 -0500 (EST)
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
This topic has always facinated me.  For a few reasons.  The main one is this:

If a remote station exists in KP4.  All Transmitters and antennas are connected 
by wires within a 500m circle or property boundries.  An operator holds license 
KP4XYZ and operates this station remotely all weekend from his/her Denver, CO 
home.  What rule exactly is broken?

I have heard that for CW contesting, remote control through the internet is not 
"real time" enough to be effective.  Can anyone who has actually tried this, 
comment?

Understand, this is not discussing remote listening posts or multiplier 
stations all over the world (those are outside the property boundries and 500m 
circle).  This is talking about remotely operating a station that if the 
operator sat down in the chair "on site" would be perfectly legal.

I have heard of a number of stations used effectively remotely as DXing 
stations on SSB but never one contested or using CW.  Not saying no-one has.  
You just don't hear about it.

Ed  N1UR
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>