CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

[CQ-Contest] QRM Buster Advance Opportunity

To: <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: [CQ-Contest] QRM Buster Advance Opportunity
From: "Eric Hilding" <dx35@hilding.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 21:49:23 -0800
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
In case you haven't read 
http://www.qrz.com/ib-bin/ikonboard.cgi?act=ST&f=3&t=150129 ...

<snip>
> What does this mean to you? 
> 
> It means that Winlink Email robots, already widely hated for randomly 
> destroying CW and PSK31 QSO's with 500 Hz-wide signals, would be allowed to 
> destroy as many as six (6) RTTY QSO's, twenty (20) CW QSO's or the entire 
> PSK31 activity segment of the band with a single wideband Pactor-III signal, 
> killing your chance to complete that rare DX or contest exchange just so the 
> less-then-one-percent of U.S. hams that use Winlink will never have to wait 
> for a 
> clear frequency within the current subbands.
>
> What can you do about this?
>
>You can file a comment on RM-11306 with the FCC by clicking on this link, 
>filling out the comment form, and telling the FCC you do not agree with 
>allowing 
> automatic operations of any kind to operate outside the current subbands:
>
>Here is an example of how to fill out the form: Be sure to type RM-11306 in 
>all caps, and also fill in your state and zip code..
<snip> 
(Go to the above URL)

I just filed my comments in this matter opposing the potential unnecessary QRM 
(especially during the CW SS or the CW NAQP).

FYI & 73...

Rick, K6VVA

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • [CQ-Contest] QRM Buster Advance Opportunity, Eric Hilding <=