It appears that the 5D5A operation is the legitimate one. Apparently the
bogus CN3A posting is by a disgruntled ?? to further stimulate the
not-so-loving disagreements between the 5D5A (@CN3A site) Italian operators
and the Italian operators @ D44AC who are soon moving to the formerly
world-class D4B site.
Will we soon have a battle of Italian Kilowatts for world supremacy? (I'm
taking bets on that one!) Anyone for on-site inspections???
Isn't life wonderful?
Jim Neiger N6TJ
----- Original Message -----
From: "David Pruett" <k8cc@comcast.net>
To: "'CQ-Contest Reflector'" <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2007 8:55 PM
Subject: [CQ-Contest] Moroccan Mystery
> Perhaps somebody can explain to me how this can be:
>
> CN3A 10221 1659 36 40,653,889 Ops: IK2QEI,IK2SGC,SV8CS
>
> 5D5A(@CN3A) 6197 1385 48 32,907,600 Ops: IK2QEI,IK2SGC
>
>
> How do three operators make 16000 QSOs with as two multi-single entries
> using separate callsigns from one station?
>
> The 5D5A entry appears in line with the other top M/S scores, but CN3A
> is over the top, and claiming only 36 hours operating time?
>
> It will be interesting to see how this one turns out when the
> logchecking is done...
>
> 73,
>
> Dave/K8CC
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|