CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] RTTY "Listening"

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] RTTY "Listening"
From: sawyered@earthlink.net
Reply-to: sawyered@earthlink.net
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 13:03:08 -0400 (GMT-04:00)
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
I am not a RTTY op so I can't comment on the need to listen or not.  

But I am a low power CW Contester, and as such, I spend more than my fair share 
of time CQing between 7030 - 7080, 14060 - 14100, and 21060 and 21100.

I can categorically state that SOME RTTYers are adament that these are their 
frequencies and that it gives them the right to intentionally QRM contesters.  
I can't get through A CONTEST without at least a few RTTYers opening up with 
RTTY dead nuts on my CQing frequency at S7 - S9plus on a frequency I have often 
been on for 10 mins to over an hour CQing.

Trust me, when I run my 100W into a 2-stack of 4 element monobanders and you 
are S9 on my meter, I am S7 - S9 plus on yours.

There is no call for it, speakers or not.  A few times I have actually listened 
to see if another RTTY station has responded to them.  Sometimes they haven't, 
and the person is still blasting me on the frequency that I occupy.  One of 
these days, I am going to get on RTTY just to respond to these "idiots" and 
surprise the hell out of the when I say "get off the frequency.  QRL".  And 
then go back to my CW Contest.

If anyone doubts this, you are obviously a RTTYer wearing rose colored glasses.

I could think of nothing, I mean nothing, that would turn me off of a contest 
more, than having RTTY and CW on at the same time (despite being listed in the 
contest section of ARRL's web site, FD is not a contest...hi).

73

Ed  N1UR
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>