OK, maybe I'm the one confused, especially after reading that long,
redundant rant...
But I thought that Cabrillo was a standardized LOGGING format, not a
standardized SCORING format.
The scoring software and related algorithms are written, fine tuned, and so
forth by the various contest sponsors and their contest committees... based
on a standard Cabrillo output, but that's as far as Cabrillo goes... right?
So I'm not sure what Paul means by "the Cabrillo system."
Whether or not he has a legitimate beef with the scoring process for a given
contest, I don't know. But I don't understand his beef with the logging
process.
So has he confused the two, or do I need to drink some coffee this morning?
(Maybe a cup or three will clear this up, although I doubt it...)
73, ron w3wn
Quantum materiae materietur marmota monax si marmota monax materiam possit
materiari?
-----Original Message-----
Date: Sun, 02 Sep 2007 17:43:36 -0400
From: "N4XM Paul D. Schrader" <n4xm@iglou.com>
Subject: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW CW 2007 Result W2/NP3D - I just did not
get it.
To: "'Andrei Stchislenok'" <asnp3d@gmail.com>, "'CQ-Contest'"
<cq-contest@contesting.com>
Andrei,
Contrary to what others have told you, their Cabrillo logging system system
is defective.
They have not responded to me after I pointed out their errors.
See below:
Bob (K3EST) and others,
I have reviewed the UBN report for N4XM and have found 6 significant errors.
The log checking process is not correct and its quality is further reduced
by
the use of the defective Cabrillo system.
<snip>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|