[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] [CQ-Contest] SO2R-SO1R from The Yukon??

To: "'Bill Turner'" <dezrat@copper.net>
Subject: Re: [RTTY] [CQ-Contest] SO2R-SO1R from The Yukon??
From: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <w4tv@subich.com>
Date: Sat, 8 Dec 2007 11:49:49 -0500
List-post: <mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
> Not a hardware category? Please explain how one can receive spotting
> assistance without extra hardware. This could be a great money saver!

Telnet spotting is built into all of the major contest logging 
software - there is no hardware difference unless you want to 
reopen the argument whether computer logging should constitute 
a separate entry category.  

How about other hardware like memory keyers, voice keyers, or 
panadapters?  Should they be the basis for separate entry 
classifications since you are so concerned about like vs. like?  
What about memory keyers, voice keyers and panadapters built into 
the transceiver?  

> -----Original Message-----
> From: rtty-bounces@contesting.com 
> [mailto:rtty-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Bill Turner
> Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2007 12:41 PM
> To: Joe Subich, W4TV
> Cc: cq-contest@contesting.com; rtty@contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [RTTY] [CQ-Contest] SO2R-SO1R from The Yukon??
> On Thu, 29 Nov 2007 16:48:50 -0500, "Joe Subich, W4TV"
> <w4tv@subich.com> wrote:
> >Assisted is not a hardware based distinction - it is a category 
> >in which the operator does not perform all functions but accepts 
> >spotting assistance.

RTTY mailing list

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>