> Not a hardware category? Please explain how one can receive spotting
> assistance without extra hardware. This could be a great money saver!
Telnet spotting is built into all of the major contest logging
software - there is no hardware difference unless you want to
reopen the argument whether computer logging should constitute
a separate entry category.
How about other hardware like memory keyers, voice keyers, or
panadapters? Should they be the basis for separate entry
classifications since you are so concerned about like vs. like?
What about memory keyers, voice keyers and panadapters built into
> -----Original Message-----
> From: firstname.lastname@example.org
> [mailto:email@example.com] On Behalf Of Bill Turner
> Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2007 12:41 PM
> To: Joe Subich, W4TV
> Cc: firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com
> Subject: Re: [RTTY] [CQ-Contest] SO2R-SO1R from The Yukon??
> ORIGINAL MESSAGE:
> On Thu, 29 Nov 2007 16:48:50 -0500, "Joe Subich, W4TV"
> <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> >Assisted is not a hardware based distinction - it is a category
> >in which the operator does not perform all functions but accepts
> >spotting assistance.
RTTY mailing list