[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Public Logs

To: "'CQ-Contest Reflector'" <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Public Logs
From: "Nodir M. Tursoon-Zadeh" <ey8mm@tjpro.net>
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 08:15:54 +0500
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
> Excuse me?  Why should contest sponsors have to answer to the whims of one
> award program?  The ARRL's DXCC program is not the final word when it comes
> down to record keeping, log posting, QSL sending, and awards management.
> Nobody elected the League god and nobody should have to subvert the inegrity
> of their contest programs just because the League has a stick up its rear
> end about log times.

Directly contest sponsor shouldn't care. Indirectly yes.

Last contest I worked few new ones on 160. Why should I loose them for DXCC? I 
better work them before contest. If this question is 
not fixed between CQ WW and DXCC than contest will loose a lot of participants 
who came to work new ones.

Is it good price for publishing logs?

PS I vote for both. I agree that logs should be available but I need my DXCC 
credits earned in contest too.


Nodir Tursoon-Zadeh

CQ-Contest mailing list

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>