Personally I think this discussion was provoked by a poorly written rule. I
'think' the intent of that rule was to ban the use of remote stations 'in
addition' to a local operating position. But that will take a clarification
on the part of the writers.
David Robbins K1TTT
e-mail: mailto:k1ttt@arrl.net
web: http://www.k1ttt.net
AR-Cluster node: 145.69MHz or telnet://dxc.k1ttt.net
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:cq-contest-
> bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Eric Hilding
> Sent: Sunday, March 16, 2008 04:13
> To: cq-contest@contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Contesting using remote stations
>
> Bob, K0RC, wrote:
>
> >So what's the consensus? Remote stations can't participate in contesting?
> If
> >that's the ultimate decision, I need to start selling my equipment, now,
> >while it still has some value.
>
> If remote stations are banned, I'm also out of here - I'd sell $25K worth
> of stuff collected so far for a remote site operation vs. losing $400K+ in
> value drop if I had to sell my house in a depressed market to move out of
> this heavily CC&R'd County before the sunspot cycle ramps up.
>
> 73...
>
> Rick, K6VVA
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|