| To: | "CQ Contest Reflector" <cq-contest@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Best & worst scenarios - 3830 postings |
| From: | "Mark Beckwith" <n5ot@n5ot.com> |
| Date: | Tue, 2 Sep 2008 20:11:45 -0500 |
| List-post: | <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
Mike said: > But they haven't been skunked. They were beat. This shows the fallacy > of relying on preliminary scores as any kind of determination of final > scores [snip] > I have a preliminary score web page ... scores get posted after > contest deadline. So Mike, why do you post the preliminary scores if using them is fallacious? Mark, N5OT _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
| Previous by Date: | [CQ-Contest] NCCC Thursday & Friday Night Practice, Sept. 5, 6 UTC - NA SPRINT rules, 30 Minutes!, Ken Keeler |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Best & worst scenarios - 3830 postings, N7mal |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Best & worst scenarios - 3830 postings, Michael Coslo |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Best & worst scenarios - 3830 postings, Michael Coslo |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |