CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Answering an age-old question

To: mwdink@eskimo.com, "cq-contest@contesting.com" <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Answering an age-old question
From: Barry <w2up3@verizon.net>
Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2008 19:21:02 +0000
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Not necessary.  The offending stations NIL penalty and dupes more than 
make up for any time he thinks he saves by not IDing.
Barry W2UP

mwdink@eskimo.com wrote:
> Then automatically send a fractional multiplier to the contest
> committee  (.1x, .2x, .5x) depending on average time between
> ID's.  :>)
>
>
>
>   
>> This is fantastic! Now, can the skimmer network be used to calculate the
>> average time it takes for a CQ-ing station to ID?
>>
>>     
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com 
> Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.9.14/1832 - Release Date: 12/5/2008 
> 9:57 AM
>
>   

-- 

Barry Kutner, W2UP             Newtown, PA   

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>