Didn't we beat this "You can't see my log" crap to death a while back? It's
rediculous. What in the heck is he hiding? Maybe he's a terrorist and a
599 means something special to his terrorist buddies. C'mon guys, let's get
on with our lives and if somebody doesn't want anybody to see his/her log,
so what? It's like keeping your strategy a big secret. Who really cares?
----- Original Message -----
From: "W0MU Mike Fatchett" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
To: "'David Kopacz'" <email@example.com>;
Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2009 9:27 PM
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW CW & 6Y1V Logs
> So does this mean that 6Y1V will be DQed as the rules read that electric
> logs are required for high scoring entrants or did 6Y1V just not submit
> anything to CQ?
> If there is nothing to hide and you stand behind your score then what do
> have to worry about?
> I can see why some would not want other to see their logs as it
> could expose a strategy that others may not be on to aside from any
> nefarious activities.
> I guess if you are not intending to follow the rules then don't operate or
> don't submit your logs for consideration of winning an award.
> Mike W0MU
> -----Original Message-----
> From: firstname.lastname@example.org
> [mailto:email@example.com] On Behalf Of David Kopacz
> Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2009 4:54 PM
> To: firstname.lastname@example.org
> Subject: [CQ-Contest] CQWW CW & 6Y1V Logs
> 6Y1V did not submit its log to CQ Magazine for the CQWW CW contest in
> I personally thank my guest operators Kelly VE4XT and Gary W5ZL for
> me the flexibility to make this decision. I want to stress that my
> below are my own, not theirs. They neither condoned nor condemn my action;
> they simply agreed to provide me the latitude to make the decision without
> prejudice. For this alone, they are to be commended. In addition, they are
> both fine gentlemen and fantastic operators.
> I am not in agreement with the CQWW committee's decision to publish logs
> without the implicit consent of the log owner simply to quell a fear of
> cheating, real or perceived. Note that I do think quell is a highly
> appropriate term here. If cheating is suspected, it should be dealt with
> privately and quietly between the committee and the accused. If outside
> assistance is needed to review logs, it should be solicited privately by
> committee. If someone is found to be cheating, then making that knowledge
> public should be done at the discretion of the committee, but based upon
> firm rules applied equally to all.
> While I understand the new policy's intent, the results may be akin to a
> public flogging in a town square. It's likely that eventually someone will
> be accused of cheating when they are truly not guilty. The accusation will
> most likely come from someone other than the contest committee. Imagine if
> the contest committee doesn't make the painstaking effort necessary to
> thoroughly review the log of the accused in order to publicly exonerate
> The perception of being accused alone will leave lasting scars for the
> innocent contester as most competitors will not independently research the
> facts themselves in order to exonerate the accused; thereby leaving the
> impression the accuser is correct.
> Our society has moved beyond this method of social restraint, so why is
> amateur radio contesting moving in the opposite direction?
> In my opinion, in a hobby where the stakes are so low, there is no
> reward and most of us do this just for fun, the idea of forcing people to
> open their personal logs for worldwide inspection is not only ludicrous
> it is downright shameful. The contest committees might as well just be
> saying "We don't trust our fellow amateurs". For a hobby founded on
> International brotherhood and goodwill, this is a very sad time.
> Since I did not have an opportunity to express my opinion during the
> decision making process, my only recourse is to publicly object and not
> in my logs. Some have suggested I shouldn't participate at all. Why should
> stop having fun just to make my point? Besides, if a few dozen
> with large logs stop sending them, it just may have a significant impact
> upon the log checking process and eventually the committee may see that
> only is this decision unpopular but it has consequences as well.
> While opening my log to anyone that asks is really no big deal, having the
> right to decide to whom and when I open it is a big deal. I choose to open
> my logs to the contest committee, but I choose not to open them to the
> world. In addition, I choose not to enable a system that assumes guilt
> before innocence.
> David ~ KY1V
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest mailing list