[Top] [All Lists]

[CQ-Contest] Dx peditions and contests

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: [CQ-Contest] Dx peditions and contests
From: Ulrich Ann <dl2hbx@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 07:19:02 -0500
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Also, the reason why they had to listen down was another Contest... WPX RTTY

I would not worry too much about ARRL CW. At the rate they are going, most 
DXers will have worked them by next weekend and the pile-ups should be moderate.

73! Uli, KK8I

-----Original Message-----
To be fair to K5D, my impression was that, this weekend, they did a lot less 
40m CW than they might otherwise have done. I presumed this was a recognition 
by them of the potential problem you describe.

Keith GM4YXI

-----Original Message-----
This weekend I listened a while to the EU mess around K5D.
Specially on 40m there was a lot of confusion because K5D listened down on CW, 
resulting in a lot of frustations to innocent PACC participants who got a large 
pileup landing on them.

Still remember last years operation of VP6DX which made the small SSB part of 
160 useless during the cq160.

I really hope K5D will stay away from cw during the ARRL DX coming weekend, 
having a large split frequency operation will cause a lot of troubles during a 
major contest like the arrl dx. It will also make large portions of the band 
unusable, which is a problem on 160 and 40.

Henk PA5KT

CQ-Contest mailing list

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>