[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Dx peditions and contests

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Dx peditions and contests
From: Henk Remijn PA5KT <pa5kt@remijn.net>
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 19:40:57 +0100
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
K0HB schreef:
>> I really hope K5D will stay away from cw during the ARRL DX coming 
>> weekend....
> It'd be even nicer to have them participate in the contest.
> 73, de Hans, K0HB
Thats also would be good.

Then the are a competitor, I already know my run frequency on all bands. :-)
Just kidding.

I got some comments on my remarks regarding VP6DX.
I was referring to the CQ160 operation, not the ARRL DX.
In the CQ160 the part of the band was useless because the big signal 
overmodulated broadband transmitting dx-ers were trying to work VP6DX, 
usually not because they heard them, but because they were spotted. They 
were not interested in the contest. I think this problem only exists in 
Most contesters would have skipped this difficult multiplier because it 
took too long to brake the pile up.


Henk Remijn PA5KT
email: pa5kt@remijn.net
www: www.remijn.net

CQ-Contest mailing list

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>