[Top] [All Lists]

[CQ-Contest] KP5 Call

To: "John T. Laney III" <k4bai@worldnet.att.net>, <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: [CQ-Contest] KP5 Call
From: "David Kopacz" <david.kopacz@aspwebhosting.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 16:54:18 -0600
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>

Thanks for your answer. Someone else just informed me they were assigned
that call and didn't specifically request it.

That must be some new rule a bored bureaucrat created to amuse

It's rather silly since there are no addresses on Desecheo, will likely
never be any addresses and the ASSIGNED and WELL KNOWN prefix is KP5.

Breaker breaker ten meters, this is bee ar five four nine calling.

David ~ KY1V

-----Original Message-----
From: John T. Laney III [mailto:k4bai@worldnet.att.net] 
Sent: Monday, February 16, 2009 4:22 PM
To: David Kopacz
Subject: Call

David:  I am sure it is because you can't get a KP5 call issued by the 
FCC without a mailing address in KP5.  So, it would be necessary to use 
a call like KP5/K4UEE.  They don't want one that long!  73, John, K4BAI.
CQ-Contest mailing list

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>