CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] An Examination of K1TTT's Reports

To: "Robert Naumann" <w5ov@w5ov.com>, <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] An Examination of K1TTT's Reports
From: "K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2009 15:51:47 -0500
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
>
> You could say that K1TTT is an "OO" (Official Observer) or "policeman of
> sorts" in the context of contesting.
>

OO's don't issue public reports.  They issue private notices.  In extreme 
cases they involve the regulators.

I think everyone (or at least most of us) think that K1TTT's investigations 
would be useful if they were privately handled (and in appropriate cases 
sent to the contest sponsor), but his public jeremiads displays are 
distasteful to reasonable people.

73, de Hans, K0HB/W7

 

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>