CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] (no subject)

To: CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] (no subject)
From: kd4d@comcast.net
Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 17:16:27 +0000 (UTC)
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Hi Joe:

Can't the amateur without an extra class license "borrow" an extra class
call and operate within his privaledges without the owner of the call being
present?  In that case, he or she COULD be the control operator.

73,

Mark, KD4D


----- Original Message -----
From: "Joe" <nss@mwt.net>
To: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@verizon.net>
Cc: "CQ-Contest" <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Sent: Sunday, June 7, 2009 6:29:57 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] (no subject)

Only if the owner of the call is there with you,

Tom Osborne wrote:

>Hi All
>
>If you don't  have a Extra class license, can you 'borrow' an Extra class 
>call, say for WPX?  73
>Tom W7WHY
>
>_______________________________________________
>CQ-Contest mailing list
>CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>  
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>No virus found in this incoming message.
>Checked by AVG - www.avg.com 
>Version: 8.5.339 / Virus Database: 270.12.55/2160 - Release Date: 06/07/09 
>05:53:00
>
>  
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>