CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Skimmer in WAE CW?

To: pa5kt@remijn.net, cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Skimmer in WAE CW?
From: Richard DiDonna NN3W <nn3w@cox.net>
Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 13:09:40 -0400
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Also, the log deadline is now two weeks after the end of the contest.  That is 
a rather significant change!

73 Rich NN3W

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Henk Remijn PA5KT" <pa5kt@remijn.net>
To: "Marijan Miletic" <s56a@bit.si>
Cc: <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Sent: Wednesday, August 05, 2009 9:37 AM
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Skimmer in WAE CW?


> WAE rules has been changed. You now can use up to 7040. Still a 
> violation of what was agreed in Region 1, (during large international 
> contest only contest-free segments are 10, 18 and 24 MHZ ) but its 
> better then then it was before.
> 
> Henk
> 
> Marijan Miletic schreef:
>> I tested Skimmer in EUHFC and intend to use it again in WAE mainly above
>> 7030 kHz :-)
>>
>> Mine is 455 kHz IF SDR similar to DH1TW design but covering both FT-1000MP
>> RX.
>>
>> Considering only 20 kHz passband available, sampling frekvency is on 466,667
>> kHz.
>>
>> This approach takes advantage of built-in wideband filter skirts on 8/45
>> MHz.
>>
>>  
>>
>> 73 de Mario, S56A
>>
>>  
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>>
>>   
> 
> 
> -- 
> Henk Remijn PA5KT
> email: pa5kt@remijn.net
> www: www.remijn.net
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>