On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 03:22:07PM -0000, Albert Crespo wrote:
> Why have more limits? Who benefits from only allowing one signal at
> time from a multi-single? Is this going to produce more QSOs in the
> contest.? More importantly, why would anyone bother to enter this
> category when it becomes so limited. There is nothing more boring
> then being at a station as a mulit-single and being unable to
> operate. Becoming a mults-two is not really a solution.
I like this change.
Here are my thoughts.
With the M/S rules proposed by the WPX contest you can now do this
contest with one radio and two or more operators. It is a true
single transmitter category and only really requires a station
that is capable of one tansmitted signal. This is cool.
The WPX contest (until recent times) had pretty much these same
rules for M/S - before there was a M/2 class - and it was great.
Since the WPX is pretty much a rate contest - the fact that you cant
go chase all the mults around is just fine.
The CQ WW DX contest M/S rule is more like a M/2 type operation.
You really need to have a station that can have two signals on
the bands at the same time. This takes much more hardware
and station design. The CQ WW DX contests do not have a multi-single
category - they are all multi-transmitter categoreis for multi op.
--
George Fremin III - K5TR
geoiii@kkn.net
http://www.kkn.net/~k5tr
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|