CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] WPX M/S Proposed rule change Summary

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] WPX M/S Proposed rule change Summary
From: Nate Bargmann <n0nb@n0nb.us>
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 17:53:52 -0600
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
For those that like the current MS class I say leave it in place.

That said, I do think that there is a place for a true M1 class.  Some
years back three of us operated CQ WW DX and had a lot of fun.  The
only thing was is that it was impossible to compare our performance to
others like us who only had one radio on the desk and one set of
antennas in the air.  I would be interested in fielding a group and
participating in an M1 class in the future, but not in the current MS
class.

The only problem I see with adding another class is that soon demand
will cause the MM to become split into M3, M4, M5, and M6, sigh.

73, de Nate >>

-- 

"The optimist proclaims that we live in the best of all
possible worlds.  The pessimist fears this is true."

Ham radio, Linux, bikes, and more: http://n0nb.us/index.html
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>