CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] XTREME category...a colossal BUST?

To: <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] XTREME category...a colossal BUST?
From: "Marijan Miletic" <s56a@bit.si>
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2010 10:44:32 +0100
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
K1DG wrote: It is both disappointing and surprising that there were no U.S
entries.

I got hint from USA about Legacy category, similar to Extreme.

The second part of the scoring will be determined by a subjective
evaluation of the technical backwardness employed by the entrant.

Some aspects worth considering:

1. Separate TX and RX with tubes
2. Mechanical VFO with LC tuning
3. Straight key or Vibroplex
4. Electronic keyer without memory
5. Paper logging of time, QSO, mults and dupes
6. Wire antennas without coaxial cable feedlines
7. RF power limited to 160 W.

73 de Mario, S56A, N1YU


_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>