CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Cut Number "J" - ASSISTED or MULTI?

To: CQ Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Cut Number "J" - ASSISTED or MULTI?
From: Zack Widup <w9sz.zack@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2010 18:32:16 -0600
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
I didn't hear a single station senfing "/QRP". I did work two stations
who sent "5" as their power. I'm glad none sent "E".
:-)

Last couple hours of contest were fun. 20 and 40 were both rocking. I
wish I could've worked the T6 who was supposedly going to be on,
though. That would've been an alltime new one for me and would've put
me 5 away from #1 HR.

73, Zack W9SZ


On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 3:11 PM, Ed K1EP <k1ep.list@gmail.com> wrote:
> This entire discussion has gotten me confused.  After reading the
> post, I heard a station just send "J" as his power.  So now I am
> thinking, is this a cut number for 1?  Is he QRP?  But if he is QRP,
> why didn't he just send /QRP like everyone else and it would be soooo
> obvious?  No, I finally realized he wasn't sending J.  He was sending
> ATT with a really bad fist!  Now I know that you can't use the phone
> during the contest, so I guessed that it was 100W.
>
> At 2/21/2010 03:02 PM, Kelly Taylor wrote:
>>Are we really going to the place where asking for clarification on generic
>>operating issues counts as assistance?
>>
>>I am sure the station that sent JTT for 100 isn't unique, so asking "what
>>does J mean" is entirely different than asking "who was the station sending
>>EE5-something?" (Considering that J is kinda stupid as a cut number anyway,
>>I don't blame anyone for being confused.)
>>
>>The former is OK, IMHO. The latter isn't permitted at all, regardless of
>>classification.
>>
>>That said, I think David should be deeply ashamed for even THINKING that
>>this sport should be fun! David, David, David: if there aren't blood
>>droplets forming on your forehead from worrying about even imaginary rule
>>infractions, you're clearly NOT serious. (/satire)
>>
>>73, kelly
>>ve4xt
>>
>>
>>On 2/21/10 8:32 AM, "David Levine" <david@levinecentral.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Bob,
>> >
>> > First off I *am* operating assisted. Regardless I don't think asking a
>> > question like this makes you assisted. It was as generic as asking does 5NN
>> > get logged as 5NN or 599. It's a generic question. But hey, what
>> do I know -
>> > I'm just out there having fun.
>> >
>> > Now back to enjoy some strong (at least for me since I've been licensed)
>> > conditions.
>> >
>> > K2DSL - David
>> >
>> > On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 7:38 AM, Robert L. Shohet
>> <kq2m@earthlink.net>wrote:
>> >
>> >> I sure hope that those of you operating in ARRLDXCW this weekend
>> >> and posting or reading this post are claiming an ASSISTED
>> >> or MULTI-something category of operation.
>> >>
>> >> In fact, asking what the "JTT"  Exchange means DURING a contest
>> >> is no different than asking for help with a Callsign DURING a contest.
>> >>
>> >> I thought that this practice was not allowed?  Seems a lot like cheating
>> >> on an exam to me.
>> >>
>> >> 73
>> >> Bob KQ2M
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>