To: | cq-contest@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Use of CW decoders in contests - NO, IT IS NOT "SIMPLE" |
From: | Nate Bargmann <n0nb@n0nb.us> |
Date: | Mon, 31 May 2010 21:15:06 -0500 |
List-post: | <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
* On 2010 31 May 20:06 -0500, Radio K0HB wrote: > Doug, > > In my opinion, internet email reflectors are mostly fact-free. How is this a reflector? Where I come from they're called mail lists. No one else but hams have mis-named this function a "reflector". 73, de Nate >> -- "The optimist proclaims that we live in the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist fears this is true." Ham radio, Linux, bikes, and more: http://n0nb.us/index.html _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Use of CW decoders in contests - NO, IT IS NOT "SIMPLE", Radio K0HB |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Use of CW decoders in contests - a contrarian opinion, Kelly Taylor |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Use of CW decoders in contests - NO, IT IS NOT "SIMPLE", Radio K0HB |
Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Use of CW decoders in contests - NO, IT IS NOT "SIMPLE", Joe |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |